Category Archives: My Two Cents

Language, Dialect, and Reactance

Posted on by

ReadingBoyI have an accent. You have an accent. We all have accents. Nobody “doesn’t have an accent,” although you often hear people claim they don’t because they speak a particularly privileged accent.

For some reason, I hear this asserted most often by people from America’s Pacific Northwest. Not sure what they’re teaching kids in school up in Ecotopia, but Oregonians and Washingtonians should know that they also speak a dialect and have an accent, just like all us Muggles.

True, in most languages there is often an accent or family of accents accepted as a “standard” for communication, but these are still accents. It’s a silly prejudice to think of one dialect as “just talking” and all the rest as accents, as silly as the prejudice that led many ancient cultures to name themselves The (Real/Genuine) People while everyone else were “the tribes.”

Just as silly as the prejudice that leads many today to honor a socially privileged style of literature as “literary” while all other styles are mere “genres.”

This sort of social signifier carries a lot of emotional weight. People are very touchy and defensive about their speaking styles, their writing styles, their cultural styles. Here’s a personal anecdote that shows how this can really make life unnecessarily difficult for everyone:

Continue reading

Category: My Two Cents, Overheard

Elevator Pitches (and all “high-concept” ideas) are MacGuffins

Posted on by

Pitch“Why do you bother with the follow-up material in some of your elevator pitches? An elevator pitch is supposed to be succinct and easy to take in quickly.”

Well, because elevator pitches alone are worthless, really. Elevator pitches, plot summaries, high-concept narratives, all of these conventional keys-through-the-gateways of publishing and Hollywood? They’re total bullshit measures of the worth (and success potential) of a story.

Continue reading

Another Voice Against the Authorhood of All Readers

Posted on by

CatherineOfSienaWritingI belong to a growing faction of writers (including my friends Les Edgerton and John Austin) who feel that publishing and literature are suffering an awful delusion: that anyone can be a writer. This myth is driven partly by an overly liberal, “everybody gets a gold star” desire to avoid negativity and offense (even when warranted) and partly by a cynical marketing strategy aimed at turning aspiring authors into an consumer base.

As usual, it’s the uneasy alliance between licentious Babylon and the exploitative Beast. And, it’s utterly unsustainable.*

Tori Telfer throws her hat in the ring with us at Bustle.com, explaining that “Creative Writing Isn’t for Everyone, And That’s Just Fine.”

Help us spread the word, and save publishing and literature in the process.

_

* For more on my take, see the Pyramid Dynamics in Publishing and Authorhood of All Readers sections of my Biz pages.

A Minor Caveat on Serious Writing and Jonathan Franzen

Posted on by

WritingRecently, I made a statement about editing, and someone asked if it contradicted a complaint I had earlier lodged against Jonathan Franzen. Specifically, I said that concern for nitpicky, sentence-by-sentence details is a cornerstone of “serious writing.”

The reader felt that I savaged John Franzen for a similar sentiment. Continue reading

Warning, Spoiler Alert: If You’re Worried About Spoiler Alerts You’re Missing the Point

Posted on by

BlackSailsSo, I was recently shamed in an internet comment feed (no surprise there) for not posting “spoiler alert” before suggesting that the character Billy Bones probably didn’t really die in the first season of the Starz series Black Sails, because the show is conceived as a prequel to Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island, in which Billy Bones plays a significant role.

The book was published in the 1880s, by the way. All of the people who read the first printing have lived their entire lives and are dead now.

Spoiler alert! The name of the cook on the show, John Silver, sounds familiar for a reason! (Yes, he’s the Long John Silver who started those seafood restaurants.)

This internet crusader wanted to pretend to care enough about the show to attack someone for revealing information, but didn’t care enough to know anything about the premise of the show. And, here’s the thing about trying to shame someone for revealing something that any real fan should know: it’s essentially a lazy, ignorant person’s attempt to make someone feel bad for being smarter than them and having the audacity not to keep their mouth shut.

And, you know what I think about trying to make people apologize for not being dumb and intellectually lazy? Continue reading

Category: My Two Cents

The Onion lampoons the saturated creative field

Posted on by

NoirJNL-01I’ve said it before: the writing community is in danger of succumbing to fatal pyramid dynamics, and partly due to the ease of online publishing.

The Onion is now having a joke at the massive fountain of online content: “Study: Online Content Creators Outnumber Consumers 2,000 To 1.”

Funny, but also with a kernel of shake-my-head truth.

Category: Blogroll, My Two Cents

I’m not the only one talking about literature in evolutionary terms

Posted on by

jnl-comicIf you were surprised at my take on the nature of literature in “Evolutionary psychology and the do’s and dont’s of writing archetypes,” the far-more-popular literature website The Millions recently published a good survey of evolutionary literary theory: “On the Origin of Novels? Encountering Literary Darwinism.”

First let me get this out of the way…

Continue reading

Category: Blogroll, My Two Cents

Why do movies really suck so badly these days?

Posted on by

mytwocentsThe other day, while discussing the evolutionary psychology of archetypes, I touched on the controversy about using patterns in writing: specifically the story-pacing “beat sheet” popularized by Blake Snyder in his Save the Cat! series, which has come under attack as a scourge of quality writing.

Peter Suderman at Slate blamed the recent trend of spectacular awfulness in film-making on Snyder’s beat sheet, but  former MGM Studio Executive Stephanie Palmer vehemently disagreed, pegging as the real culprit the fact that movies are “incredibly hard to make.” Palmer’s primary methodology is to set up straw-man syllogisms to (mis)represent Suderman’s point-of-view, then fail to address the formal errors in the syllogisms she invents while making inane assertions that in no way rule out anything Suderman said.

Not. Thinking. It. Through.

But the main reason I want to respond is that she resorts to the laughable George W. Bush excuse for failure: “It’s hard work!” If you find a job too hard, let someone else do it!

Continue reading

One-Layer Thinking or How Not to Understand Authors

Posted on by

mytwocentsWriter’s Digest and Digital Book World conducted a survey of over 9000 authors on their preferences for traditional or self-publishing. The full results will be presented at the upcoming Digital Book World Conference, but DBW has published preliminary findings online, in a post titled “Indie Authors and Others Prefer Traditional Publishing…Slightly,” which publishing mavens have already started pontificating about.

And, as is typical, the analysis is shallow and misleading. Here’s the part the LA Times, in a piece titled “Authors prefer traditional publishers to self-publishing,” chose to focus on:

Despite the rise of self-publishing and the enthusiasm with which self-published authors celebrate its ascendance, overall, the authors surveyed are more interested in traditionally publishing their next book. The greatest preference for traditionally publishing was reported by traditionally published authors (87.2%) followed by not-yet-published authors (76.8%). Among authors who have self-published, more than half hoped to publish with traditional publishers — 53.5% of self-published authors and 57.8% of hybrid authors.

If you take a look at those numbers one layer deeper, however, you can see the real story: the continuing stigma against self-publishing among those who have never tried it. Continue reading

Category: My Two Cents

Rough Guide to SI Units of Length

Posted on by

scifiHumans tend to get befuddled by inhuman scales. This is nowhere so obvious as in bad science fiction and bad science reporting. And, just bad science.

An inability to grasp the vast scales of outer space caused lots of people to mistakenly believe the Voyager spacecraft was ‘leaving the solar system’ (which likely extends out to 10 petameters) when it was, in fact, merely crossing the heliopause (about 15 to 30 terameters). In case you’re wondering, a petameter is equal to one thousand terameters; it’s quite an error in scale to mark the boundary of our star system at under 30 of a given unit when that star exerts its influence out to 10,000 of those units.

As you can guess, I’m a big fan of SI units and their remarkably efficient prefix system. I think it’s about time we started using SI, to the exclusion of alternatives whenever reasonable. (Fantasy and historical fiction writers, you’re off the hook!) Long ago, one might have made the argument that people can’t grasp the thousand-fold relationship between SI prefixes, but the enthusiasm with which consumers rode the electronic ramp-up from kilobytes to megabytes to gigabytes to terabytes proves otherwise.

People get it. SI is workable. So, how about we stop talking about how many miles it is to various celestial destinations, especially since confusion about English and SI units actually caused the complete loss of a $200M Mars mission? In fact, let’s just ditch the insane menagerie of units bandied about in astronomy, the parsecs and light-years and AUs. We have SI units to cover these scales. In fact, we have SI units to cover all scales. That’s kinda the idea!

And, anyone who talks about how many “million kilometers” it is to Jupiter or Saturn should be euthanized. “Meter” is the base unit and “kilo” means “thousand.” Are you telling us that Jupiter is eight hundred million thousand meters from the Sun? Forgive me, but that’s unforgivably dumb. If you mean “gigameter” then say it. If you think people need reminded how big “giga” is, try a  parenthetical statement or, hell … let them Google it.

Also, I understand the utility of scientific notation in calculation, but in description it is obnoxious, particularly when the description is intended for general audiences. Use the prefixes.

So… having voiced my complaint, let me get to the Rough Guide promised by the title of this rant:

Continue reading

Category: My Two Cents