Tag Archives: publishing

Passive Guy shows how Hachette is shooting itself in the foot

Posted on by

jnlThe Passive Voice blog (“A Lawyer’s Thoughts on Authors, Self-Publishing and Traditional Publishing”) has posted an extensive quote from GigaOm on the details of the recent Amazon-Hachette deal.

But, what I found more interesting was the Passive Guy‘s economic analysis of traditional publishers’ myopic and desperate tactics. The bold emphasis is mine:

Since Big Publishing has attempted to use ebook pricing to protect the sales of physical books in physical bookstores in the past, PG suspects it will continue to do so in the future. If this is the case, Hachette ebook prices on Amazon will be higher than Amazon would set those prices if the folks in Seattle had unfettered pricing discretion.

If PG’s suspicions are anywhere close to correct, it appears that indie authors will continue to be able to undercut the price of ebooks from Hachette while earning royalties from KDP that are much higher than Hachette authors receive.

PG says that indie authors are much smarter about pricing ebooks on Amazon than Big Publishing is … Like Amazon, indie authors don’t have any legacy sales channels to distract them from setting an optimum price for ebooks.

Trying to protect a legacy business with legacy margins is a classic mistake that established business organizations make when faced with a technology disruption that allows lower-priced competitors into a marketplace. Doing so allows the lower-priced competitors to survive and thrive. And eventually put the legacy model out of business.

Check out the rest at The Passive Voice.

Category: Sharing | Tags: , , ,

Lee Child doesn’t understand arithmetic, economics, or the book trade

Posted on by

Picard-FacepalmI understand that Amazon’s size is a problem for the marketplace. I am a strong antitrust advocate.

However, I also understand being the biggest guy in a fight doesn’t categorically make you the bad guy. Most importantly, I understand that spreading lies and logical fallacies, however well-intentioned, is toxic to the integrity of public discourse and therefore hurts everyone in the long run.

A lot of Amazon’s critics don’t seem to understand those last two critical facts.

For example, thriller writer Lee Child has been getting a lot of press lately for a BBC Newsnight interview in which he tries to dismantle Amazon’s position in their dispute with contract-fumbling, deadline-bumbling Hachette. But, when you take a close look at his logic, if you can call it that, not only does it fall apart but it displays a remarkable lack of basic knowledge and reasoning.

Specifically addressing Amazon’s arguments about the economic efficiency of selling ebooks at lower prices, Child calls Amazon’s claims “disingenuous,” then sneers:

There is a very specialized branch of science that you can examine these propositions with. It’s called arithmetic.

Let’s remember that Child is invoking disingenuousness and arithmetic. They’re the ropes with which he’ll hang himself. Continue reading

Not that Goliath needs defending, but … Hachette is not the David you’re looking for

Posted on by

mytwocentsSometimes, the underdog is the bad guy. I know, I know this is anathema to American sentiments. But sometimes, every now and then, the little guy is the greater of two evils who deserves what the Big Bad Tough dishes out.

So, let’s talk about Hachette v. Amazon.

It seems these days like Amazon is the tall poppy everyone is eager to take a whack at. And, I’m no fan of the near-monopoly power enjoyed by giants like Amazon, Walmart, Google, etc. in a what should be a merit-rewarding, competitive market economy. Amazon’s god-like reach is indisputably problematic.

But, there’s something to be said about the indispensable power of sheer power to sweep out poor practices.

Consider the latest uproar over Amazon’s offer—widely dismissed as a PR stunt—to give Hachette authors 100 percent of ebook sales until the current pricing dispute is settled. Actually, don’t consider the uproar or the offer. Consider instead the allegations of bumbling and stalling that Amazon has levied against Hachette, and Hachette’s ironically confessional reaction to them. Continue reading

From a non-Franzenatic, this might be a bit unexpected

Posted on by

So …writing You guys know I’m not a Franzen fanatic, but I feel compelled to share my thoughts on his recent interview at Scratch.

The consensus seems to be that it was a great back-and-forth, and I agree. Straightforward questions, frank answers. What an interview should be.

Here are my thoughts on the the highlights, starting with the stuff with which I agree and saving my only disagreement with Franzen for last.

Continue reading

What’s J Been Reading? [Feast of Qawl, 23 Nov 11]

Posted on by

Of course, the big news in the literary world is the passing of Anne McCaffrey. The best tribute (I have read) to this amazing author is by Juliette Wade, who discusses how McCaffrey brought genre definitions into play with her Dragonriders of Pern series.  Also at Wade’s Talk To YoUniverse blog: an excellent piece on how hard choices for your characters require consequences.

Melville House, one of my favorite sources for publishing news, details an intense and disappointing exchange between blogger Jeremy Duns, who outed the plagiarism of Quentin Rowan, and the latest accused plagiarist Lenore Hart.  (By the way, considering that her subject is Poe, Lenore Hart must be a pseudonym, yes?)

BEST READ OF THE DAY: Josh Getzler at Hey There’s a Dead Guy gives us a truly remarkable insight into the writing process by showing us how a writer feels when he’s given the opportunity to enjoy his own writing as a reader.  There is so much that can be taken from this piece (for writers and readers) that I won’t say more.  Go check it out.

What Has J Been Reading? [Vespasian’s Birthday, 17 Nov 11]

Posted on by

After my brief detour through Charles Bukowski‘s Pulp, I am back into Raymond Chandler‘s anthology, The Simple Art of Murder.  Specifically, the short story “Pickup On Noon Street.”  Lots of archaic racial stereotypes, so I am waiting to see if the story rolls into some redeeming qualities.

In science news, Jupiter’s moon Europa is believed to have shallow subsurface lakes that connect to the deeper moon-wide ocean.  Hard sci-fi writers … On your mark! Get set!

On the writing front: Continue reading

Ten Literary Rumors I’d Like To Start

Posted on by

In honor of my friend Ron Gullekson‘s blog post, “Ten Rumors I’d Like To Start,” let me offer my bookish version: Continue reading

Curing The Heartbreak of Being Published.

Posted on by

I love this article.  It is realistic and honest, even brutally so, but tough and helpful. Love it, love it, love it.

In a blogosphere where so much of what’s aimed at the aspiring writer is positive-thinking pablum, author Ruth Harris offers us some warnings, some disillusionment, and some practical advice on how to get over it all, in her “6 Prescriptions To Cure The Heartbreak Of Being Published.” 

The comment thread is also an eyeful (and a mindful) as well.  Kudos on a fantastic piece of advice!

A Case Study In How The Dunning-Kruger Effect Can Undermine Literature (And What We Can Do About It)

Posted on by

Recently, a writer friend of mine (let’s call this person T) sent me a link to a story at The Onion shredding the pretensions of a bad writer who has no idea he’s a bad writer, called “Novelist Has Whole Shitty World Plotted Out.”

Explaining the link, T had added a simple message: “God, this makes me self-conscious as hell.”

There is no reason to be self-conscious, because T is one of the best writers I know, published or not, and one of the few writers whose voice moves me to envy.  Reading Stephen King’s On Writing: A Memoir of the Craft, I was repeatedly reminded of T’s writing by King’s easy and evocative style.  T is a natural.

At the same time, another friend of mine asked me to read a story written by an acquaintance, whom we will call C.  C has been writing for years, is well-educated, and well-versed in all the Do’s & Don’ts of writery. Yet, lurking in the first paragraph were half a dozen cringe-worthy mistakes that any decent writer should know to avoid.  As I read on, it didn’t get better, so I reluctantly told my friend that I thought the story was quite awful.

We were each relieved to find the other in agreement.

Yet, while T is hesitant despite natural talent, C is determined and confident all out of proportion to reality. I had stumbled onto a perfect case study in the contrast between over-confident yet lousy writers and talented yet self-doubting writers, demonstrating the perverse influence the “Dunning-Kruger Effect” has on literature, a problem I have discussed before.

_

Continue reading

Publishing Saturation

Posted on by

There are some numbers floating around the internet, allegedly drawn from Publishers Weekly (but referencing a now-defunct link to a PW Daily installment), that show the number of publishers over time starting in the late 1940s.  The numbers are intriguing, however, because when they are charted they exhibit an exponential growth curve.

Of course, there is a legitimate question as to how many of the later “publishers” are actually one-off enterprises set up to sell a single author’s book or set of books, in which case an apples-to-apples comparison might show a more reasonable growth curve.  For example, PW’s 2002 numbers show that the big five New York publishers accounted for nearly half of the market, while Andre Schiffren at the Washington Post reported in 2000 that the top 20 publishers accounted for 93 percent of sales.  Perhaps the growth curve is largely about the extension of the lower margin of a very tight power law distribution.

Anyone have more reliable numbers?