Tag Archives: publishing

Another Swipe at Lee Siegel (Which Reminds Me of Tolkien’s Faramir)

Posted on by

The other day, I pointed you to Carolyn Kellogg‘s masterful debunking of Lee Siegel‘s snide and absurd assertion in the New York Observer that fiction is dead and culturally “irrelevant.”

Now, Jason Pinter has added insult to well-deserved injury with his attack on Siegel, with a piece in the Huffington Post arguing that it’s not fiction, but the snooty “literati” class that is dead and culturally irrelevant for dismissing the importance of genre fiction.

Pinter states:

The more the literary establishment simply ignores anything other than the moldy old status quo, the quicker they will join Lee Siegel in his musty ivory tower, missing out on all the wonderful books, blogs and writers who revel in writing outside the archaic rules of the literary establishment.

This observation brings to mind a quote from the greatest work of genre fiction of the 1900’s, and perhaps the most influential fiction of any sort in that century, Tolkien’s Lord of the Rings.  I can still remember when being a fan of Tolkien was an occasion for ridicule, but the themes of addiction, the strength of the “little guy,” and overcoming despair in the face of violent evil were addressed nowhere as vividly as in Tolkien’s fantasy story about furry-footed hobbits.

Put into the mouth of Gandalf in the film adaptation, the quote brought to mind by Pinter’s observation above is from Faramir in the book:

The Númenorians … hungered after endless life unchanging.  Kings made tombs more splendid than houses of the living, and counted the names in the rolls of their descent dearer than the names of sons.  Childless lords sat in aged halls musing on heraldry; in secret chambers withered men compounded strong elixirs, or in high cold towers asked questions of the stars.

Do I have my misgivings about certain trends in today’s literary world?  Absolutely!  I could use fewer sparkly pedophilic vampires, and I am less than sanguine about the recent trend toward sampled mash-ups.

But, unless the literary elite want to end up throne-less and irrelevant, they will move with the flow of culture’s river, appreciate the best writers driving today‘s literature, and leave aside their foolish dreams of a perpetual Golden Age based on dry honors and impotent nostalgia.

Writer Roll – Writing Backward, Tasting Stories, and Tricking Your Kids

Posted on by

I have noticed a distinct gender imbalance to my writer links.  Sure, I have Les and Scott and John and J on my list, but the overwhelming majority of writers on my regular rounds are women.   In fact, all of the links I’ve roped up over the past week are from women writers.

Not that there is anything intrinsically wrong with this, but I would like to get a few more dudes to provide more of a “guy’s take” on writing.  Insofar as there is such a thing.  Is there such a thing? 

Okay, moving on.  To the writer links! Continue reading

Literary Speed Dating Down Under

Posted on by

Here’s an interesting idea.  Melbourne’s Wheeler Centre for Books, Writing and Ideas is hosting a  literary speed dating event in July as part of their “Week of Love and Lust.”

The idea is that the love of reading is a strong tie that can spark good conversation, affection, and maybe more.  Wonder if such a thing might work north of Oz?

The article on the event at the Sydney Morning Herald is great, and goes on to provide a peek into romance among various publishing types like historians, playwrights, poets, writers festival organizers, novelists, and critics.

Check it out, because I said so! 🙂

Working Historical Anomalies Into Your Sci-Fi – The 1178 Moon Incident

Posted on by

On this day, 18 June, in the year 1178 in Canterbury, England, a group of monks reported seeing a strange “flaming torch” on the moon, which caused the moon to “writhe” like “a wounded snake.”

Bizarre and unexplained real-world events like this can be the jumping-off point for a good science fiction story.  Did these monks see an explosion, perhaps a meteor impact as some scientists have suggested, or was something more strange going on?

A backwoods skirmish in an interstellar war?  A rift in the spacetime continuum?  The appearance of a time-travel machine from our own century?  The arrival of several alien probes?

Of course, such an event could also be worked into a fantasy story.  Perhaps the moon became the last refuge of the dragons, and the monks were witnessing their fiery departure from Earth.

Here is a translation of the incident, as recorded by Gervase of Canterbury:

There was a bright new moon, and as usual in that phase its horns were tilted toward the east; and suddenly the upper horn split in two. From the midpoint of this division a flaming torch sprang up, spewing out, over a considerable distance, fire, hot coals, and sparks. Meanwhile the body of the moon which was below writhed, as it were, in anxiety, and, to put it in the words of those who reported it to me and saw it with their own eyes, the moon throbbed like a wounded snake. Afterward, it resumed its proper state. This phenomenon was repeated a dozen times or more, the flame assuming various twisting shapes at random and then returning to normal. Then after these transformations the moon from horn to horn, that is along its whole length, took on a blackish appearance.

What sort of story do you think could be built around this strange incident?

Is Fiction Dead (Again)?

Posted on by

I would like to thank Carolyn Kellogg of the LA Times’ “Jacket Copy” blog for debunking (point by point no less!) the truly tired argument made by Lee Siegel of the New York Observer that — once again — fiction is dead.

Some of Kellogg’s points are true Ouch! moments, like when she debunks Siegel’s assertion that the New Yorker‘s much-criticized “20 Under 40” list of up-and-coming authors had spawned no counterlists.  Kellogg hyper-links to multiple serious and satirical counterlists.

But, most of Kellogg’s critique is amusing because it reveals how remarkably incoherent and nonsensical Siegel’s arguments can be.  He makes a muddled comparison of “obsession” and “clarity,” tries to contrast the past with the present by use of synonyms, depl0ys a definition of literary doom that fails analogy to other artforms, twice confuses the rise of non-fiction with the fall of fiction, and gets “issues of popularity, commercialism and literariness … all jumbled up.”

It’s a good read.  Click it, because (as I just mentioned) it’s a good read.

Of course, considering Siegel’s proven disregard for the boundaries between reality and falsehood (Sprezzatura anyone?) it’s not surprising that he is unable to recognize the thunderous pulse still driving blood through the ever-quick veins of Fiction.

My Two Cents – What a Difference Five Percent Could Make

Posted on by

The Writer Beware! blog’s Victoria Strauss posted an intriguing piece based on a recent Twitter frenzy on the possibility that literary agents might bump their rates from 15 to 20 percent.   The comments, as one might expect, are all over the place, with readers coming down on this or that (or the other) side of the debate.

Continue reading

The Future of Lit Journals in an Online World

Posted on by

At The Huffington Post, Anis Shivani interviews Colorado Review editor Stephanie G’Schwind to investigate the way literary journals are weathering the economic crisis and the internet revolution.

G’Schwind also discusses the impact of the MFA, and what sort of writing passes muster in her own journal’s selection process.  A great read for writers: check it out!

Behind the Scenes of Editing a Book

Posted on by

Every once in a while, you read something that just puts a whole new perspective on things.  Authors, prepare your Epiphany Hats!

At The New Yorker, writer Susan Orlean shares a true-life tale about the insane odyssey she went through during the editing phase of her first published book. Continue reading

What Do Self-Published Author's Ten Literary Prizes Mean?

Posted on by

As almost any industry blog will tell you, the publishing biz is in flux.  New formats, new challenges, new avenues to success have put every assumption and axiom of recieved wisdom up for grabs.

In the midst of all this chaos progress change, it is still possible to recognize an event that sheds new light on the evolving dynamics of publishing.

For example, promotional and marketing specialist Steff Deschenes has scooped up nearly a dozen literary prizes for her self-published commentary on everyday life, The Ice Cream Theory.  In it, she compares different personality types with different flavors of frozen treat. Continue reading

Lit Agent Links – Queries, Book Deals, and a Day in the Life

Posted on by

First of all, let me do a favor for Jessica at BookEnds LLC, and literary agents everywhere, by reminding all of you prospective authors out there that a “novel” is a fictional narrative longer than 50,000 words.  There is no need to say “fiction novel” and no reason to say “non-fiction novel.”

And now, let’s go on to the links! Continue reading